Combat

[Exblade]

In the Game were you harvest wood,gold, shake trees, and marriage. there comes a huge annoyance that is even worst than the monsters. The Deer. true you could use a bomb and blow that thing to kingdom come, but then it wrecks most of anything else in its path. my suggestion is that we should have both monsters and workers being able to fight or atleast chase the deer away.

anyway sorry if my suggestion is a terrible one. :)

oh wait i see another thread like this, sorry everyone just ignore this one

[kittenlazars go mew mew]

Noooooo I like this idea,but except not the monsters fighting,you fought!When you walked up to a deer,a big red COMBAT! sign would appear,and it would be like FF battles.

[sweet_love]

But that'd be annoying... >w<

[1samurai1]

LOL thats classic

[MonsterMiner]

No the games too easy already, how easy do you want it to be?

[Exblade]

well it wouldnt make it too easy, because the deer could easily return with even more deer for a certain amount of time. so if your workers chased the deer away. the deer would come back with even more deer that you would have to chase away.

[Exblade]

But that'd be annoying... >w<

exactly how would that be annoying?

[sweet_love]

The FF battles, by kitten.

And if you added soldiers, then the game becomes less appealing as time goes on because it'll become less interactive. In the end, it'll just become a big blob of pretty colours.

[MonsterMiner]

It wasn't a blob of pretty colors?

[1samurai1]

Violence and more action will probably attract more players, but at the same time, could make others leave

[sweet_love]

Nah, it's an interactive game of pretty colours.

[screwbaII]

I like it the way it is. It's cute. It's fun. It's a great change of pace from the usual games I play. That's why I like it, because it's different. Isn't there enough fighting games without making this one a fighting game too?

[LegendaryLance]

I think a form of combat could work not necessarily workers attack, but like you personally dealing with pests could work. Depends on how they worked it out. Bombs were more annoying then the deer for me on my second time around, they kept spawning in my tree garden so the bomb did more damage then help, deer just keep eating all the shaken down fruit XD

[bunnibear]

just go hunting mode for dear. equip a weapon that while holding down a key on the keyboard (maybe spacebar) bunni would stay in place and shoot in the direction you're clicking... this way you could selectively kill deer... this was suggested in the merchandise section > check out the attached pic

[nitrobunni]

i totally agree you should an optional tower were you put workers there and they will have swords and fight deers(no blood please)

[Riida]

Well whats the deer gonna do?Eat ur sword or something??

[Lovelight]

Parents do NOT want children to experience what it's like killing a deer. :(

[Exblade]

Nah, it's an interactive game of pretty colours.

sory for necromancing. but i personaly think the easiest way to make sure its not so violent is to have the workers shoo the deer away.

[JesusChrist]

There is a bomb that only blows up deer and monsters, so the hurt your island thing doesn't affect anymore, and combat would be kinda cool, but more in depth suggestions are needed, like a lv systmer or would it just be button mashing, ect.
And god forbid compared to all the other games, there parents see there kids kill dear...
Oh the humanity! What next, HUNTING!?!!? Oh wait, thats been here for thousands of years >.>
XD

[MonsterMiner]

or maybe away from combat and more on other stuff?????????

[JesusChrist]

OMGOSH! YOU SOUND LIKE A DEMOCRAT!?! xD

[Lovelight]

But seriously, there are bombs. Why not bomb deers up?

[screwbaII]

just go hunting mode for dear. equip a weapon that while holding down a key on the keyboard (maybe spacebar) bunni would stay in place and shoot in the direction you're clicking... this way you could selectively kill deer... this was suggested in the merchandise section > check out the attached pic

Theres already a game for this. It's called deer hunter.


And god forbid compared to all the other games, there parents see there kids kill dear...
Oh the humanity! What next, HUNTING!?!!? Oh wait, thats been here for thousands of years >.>
XD

your sarcasm has a point, but this game in its present state can be played by younger children about 4 - 5 without parents worrying about them being exposed to things such as death, blood, gore and killing, because, you know, death isn't really something that is nice for young children to be exposed to so early.

I say if you want a combat game, go play a combat game. Don't try to change a game like this into something that it is not, i.e. it is not meant to be a fighting and killing game, its meant to be a fun non-violent interactive cute game. If you don't like the type of game it is, then don't play it.

[JesusChrist]

Theres already a game for this. It's called deer hunter.



your sarcasm has a point, but this game in its present state can be played by younger children about 4 - 5 without parents worrying about them being exposed to things such as death, blood, gore and killing, because, you know, death isn't really something that is nice for young children to be exposed to so early.

I say if you want a combat game, go play a combat game. Don't try to change a game like this into something that it is not, i.e. it is not meant to be a fighting and killing game, its meant to be a fun non-violent interactive cute game. If you don't like the type of game it is, then don't play it.

Must I refer you to pirate peachs dance?

[MonsterMiner]

The dance isnt that much is it, anyway if you want to talk about the dance there is a thread for it already.

[JesusChrist]

The dance isnt that much is it, anyway if you want to talk about the dance there is a thread for it already.



No your being blunt mister D< Were refering it to "killing" and if 5 years olds do play it, which WAS explained above, they would see this dance, and I could imagine the idea of a private dance, in then clothing, and the concept of eating a rose also reffers to... clubs XD, then the child seeing such, so if it is child based, there is alot to be desired.
Also there is alchahol refrence, and some sexuall refrences, there for making combat the least of child protection worries.

[MonsterMiner]

No your being blunt mister D< Were refering it to "killing" and if 5 years olds do play it, which WAS explained above, they would see this dance, and I could imagine the idea of a private dance, in then clothing, and the concept of eating a rose also reffers to... clubs XD, then the child seeing such, so if it is child based, there is alot to be desired.
Also there is alchahol refrence, and some sexuall refrences, there for making combat the least of child protection worries.

Sorry I'm too lazy to read what's above, do you know how time consuming that would be for me to read every post above the latest post on every thread? Anyway number one would people very young understand the hints? And if they do understand then they already knew.

[screwbaII]

Must I refer you to pirate peachs dance?

Pirate peach's dance was nothing but a joke. Didn't even do anything or show anything offensive. If anyone took that as an attempt of "furry" then you're clearly an idiot

[MonsterMiner]

Wasn't it furry??
:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D